Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effective dose and cancer risk of examinations in EOS imaging system in different age and gender groups. Materials and methods: In total, 555 patients who had undergone common EOS imaging examinations were entered into the study. Exposure parameters and patients' characteristics for lower limb, full spine and full body imaging techniques, at different gender and age groups, were evaluated. Finally, effective dose and risk of exposure induced cancer death (REID) was calculated with the Monte Carlo based PCXMC software. Results: The difference between average effective doses of male and female was not significant (p ≥ 0.05), however, the corresponding REID showed statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.001). The average effective dose of patients (without considering technique, age and gender) was obtained as 0.13 mSv. The corresponding average REID was 8.84 per million. The maximum average effective dose value was obtained for patients over 10 years of age with the full body technique (0.17 ± 0.05 mSv). The maximum average REID value was obtained for full body technique and for patient with 0-10 years old (15.20 ± 10.00 per million). Conclusion: In common EOS imaging examinations, the effective dose and REID values of patients in both genders in all age groups are less than the corresponding values in other imaging modalities (according to previous studies). However, according to stochastic effects of ionizing radiation and based on the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle, more considerations are necessary, especially in the full body technique and for female examinations.