Abstract

Early detection of tuberculosis (TB) reduces the interval between infection and the beginning of treatment. However, commercially available tests cannot discriminate between BCG-vaccinated healthy persons and patients. Also, they are not suitable to be used for immunocompromised persons. In recent years, biosensors have attracted great attention due to their simple utility, accessibility, and real-time outputs. These sensors are increasingly being considered as pioneering tools for point-of-care diagnostics in communities with a high burden of TB and limited accessibility to reference laboratories. Among other types of biosensors, the electrochemical sensors have the advantages of low-cost operation, fast processing, simultaneous multi-analyte analyzing, operating with turbid samples, comparable sensitivity and readily available miniaturization. Electrochemical biosensors are sub-divided into several categories including: amperometric, impedimetric, potentiometric, and conductometric biosensors. The biorecognition element in electrochemical biosensors is usually based on antibodies (immunosensors), DNAs or PNAs (genosensors), and aptamers (aptasensors). In either case, whether an interaction of the antigen-antibody/aptamer or the hybridization of probe with target mycobacterial DNA is detected, a change in the electrical current occurs that is recorded and displayed as a plot. Therefore, impedimetric-based methods evaluate resistance to electron transfer toward an electrode by a Nyquist plot and amperometric/voltammetric-based methods weigh the electrical current by means of cyclic voltammetry, square wave voltammetry, and differential pulse voltammetry. Electrochemical biosensors provide a promising scope for the new era of diagnostics. As a consequence, they can improve detection of traces even in attomolar scales.